View more cities |
View 7 day forecast
News Headlines
 

CLASH: New public prosecutions chief Menzi Simelane disagreed with his predecessor, Vusi Pikoli, who said he alone had the final say over management at the National Prosecuting Authority. Picture: DESIREE SWART

‘Hands-on’ Simelane has a different take on prosecuting body

Published: 2009/11/26 06:31:48 AM

WHEN he was director-general of the Department of Justice, Menzi Simelane expressed a very different view of his new role as national director of public prosecutions than his predecessor, Vusi Pikoli.

If Simelane stands by those opinions, a differently structured National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) can be expected to the one under Pikoli. During last year’s inquiry into Pikoli’s fitness to hold office, chaired by former speaker of the National Assembly Frene Ginwala, Simelane described the “difference of opinion” between himself and Pikoli.

While Pikoli’s opinion was that he alone had the final say in the management of the NPA, Simelane said the director-general’s role as accounting officer meant more than being a “bean counter”.

But for Pikoli this affected the independence of his office. The two had clashed on a number of issues, the root of which was a different view of the proper relationship between the post of director-general and that of prosecutions chief.

Both Pikoli and Simelane were directors-general of justice and went on to become prosecutions directors. In each case, Simelane followed Pikoli. Simelane was appointed director-general of justice in 2005.

But in her report, Ginwala came down squarely for Pikoli’s view of the relationship between the two posts.

She had severe words for Simelane, saying he had ignored legal advice which favoured Pikoli’s view and “continued to assert powers he did not have”.

She also accused Simelane of being “reckless” because he drafted the letter from former justice minister Brigitte Mabandla that unconstitutionally instructed Pikoli to stop any plan to arrest former police commissioner Jackie Selebi.

After Ginwala’s report, the Public Service Commission (PSC) was asked to investigate her complaints about Simelane. Former president Kgalema Motlanthe said at the time that once the honesty of a director- general had been questioned, it needed to be investigated.

But former justice minister Enver Surty defended Simelane, saying he had found him to be “extremely hard working, very committed and passionate about his work”.

Many saw the lambasting Simelane received as his taking the fall for his political bosses — Mabandla and former president Thabo Mbeki .

A justice official told Business Day that, as justice director-general, Simelane had been “very hands-on” and had a tendency to simply take over when he felt people were not getting the job done. This made him unpopular in some quarters, but he had also been responsible for getting the department’s books in order for the first time.

The official said Simelane processed and ensured the passing of a lot of legislation on the judiciary and had been responsible for the automation of the court system.

Before his appointment as justice director-general, Simelane was the first head of the Competition Commission, in 1999.

The PSC’s investigation has not been made public, but it is understood the probe left it to the discretion of the justice minister to take any disciplinary steps he felt appropriate.

President Jacob Zuma said yesterday that Simelane would not face a disciplinary hearing.

rabkinf@bdfm.co.za

Post comment here (You must login first)   Login | Register
All comments are moderated and will be posted only if they are about the subject and are not abusive, vulgar and/or discriminatory
Article Tools
Print
By: Tman2010 On: Nov 26 2009 1:55PM
Let us give Advocate Simelane the benefit of doubt, the wait an see approach would be approciated at this juncture. Our constitution provides us with lot of mechanics if one institution is poor manage or there is an abuse of power we can approach other institutions for a probe. But we need to encourage our govt to utilized former govt officials, ministers and president when they making critical dicisions.Philani@Umlazi
By: hilly1963 On: Nov 26 2009 5:10PM
I always worry that 'hands-on' is a result of 'brains-off'
By: et2bru On: Nov 26 2009 8:00AM
The using this cornerstone of State legitimacy as a political weapon of opponent destruction and self protection is ever present in our thoughts, because that is all it appears to be about. We pray that this dictatorship soon be over so that the seeds of an ethical democracy may get some nutrients.
By: geanann On: Nov 26 2009 8:28AM
He has different views on many things it seems and it does not always agree with conventional opinion. A "I will die, lie and kill for you" kind of a guy. See http://letterdash.com/g.annandale/integrity-simelane-and-african-law
 
 


 
Featured Top Stories
National
World
Companies
Markets
Economy & Business
Sport
Motoring
Lifestyle
Tech
JSE Today Commodities Currencies
 
Find Share
 
 
Editor's Picks
 
Most Read Most Commented
 
Services & Updates
Follow us on Twitter
Top stories
Register for:
-Daily Newsletter
-Article Comments
-My Portfolio
Subscribe to:
-Print Publications
-News Headlines
 (SMS BDNEWS to 31899)
 


Subscribe  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Register  |  SiteMap  |  NewsLetter

Financial Mail   |  Summit TV   |  Bignews   |  Netassets   |  I-Net Bridge   |  Business Media in Education   |  Pearson Plc   |  Avusa

BDFM Publishers (Pty) Ltd disclaims all liability for any loss, damage, injury or expense however caused, arising from the use of or reliance upon, in any manner, the information provided through
this service and does not warrant the truth, accuracy or completeness of the information provided.
online publishers association member Proudly Part of Avusa Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 BDFM Publishers (Pty) Ltd. All Rights Reserved