BusinessDay
Management & Leadership >> Home
Last Updated: Tuesday, 09 February 2010 06:28:42

Radebe comes out firing in Simelane row

Published: 2009/12/01 06:34:21 AM
 

OUT OF IT: Former prosecutions head Vusi Pikoli was instructed to halt the arrest of former police commissioner Jackie Selebi in a letter drafted by the current occupier of the post, Menzi Simelane. Picture: THE TIMES

THE Public Service Commission (PSC), the Ginwala inquiry and former justice minister Brigitte Mabandla were all in the firing line yesterday as Justice Minister Jeff Radebe defended the appointment of Menzi Simelane as national director of public prosecutions.

President Jacob Zuma and Radebe have their backs to the wall on Simelane’s appointment. Yesterday’s defence comes amid a welter of criticism from the legal fraternity and opposition parties that Simelane is not a fit and proper person to lead the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), as required by law.

The General Council of the Bar is considering whether to proceed with an investigation of Simelane and the Democratic Alliance is taking advice on whether there is a legal basis to challenge the appointment.

Key to the defence of the president ’s choice of the next head of prosecutions — Simelane takes office today — was the fact that Simelane was not allowed to state his case to the PSC before it made its recommendation that he face disciplinary procedures.

Radebe said this fatally compromised the PSC investigation and its report to him and led him to the conclusion that its recommendations that disciplinary action be taken against Simelane had no merit. He said he had taken guidance from a submission to the PSC by two advocates on behalf of Simelane.

In a detailed dismissal of the allegations against Simelane, Radebe said that the Ginwala inquiry was about former prosecutions boss Vusi Pikoli’s fitness to hold office, and not about Simelane .

Because Ginwala had probed Pikoli and not Simelane, the PSC decision to base its findings only on Ginwala’s report, and not to hear evidence from Simelane on his conduct, was a fatal flaw.

“This completely violates advocate Simelane’s fundamental rights to the principle that any person who is affected by a finding must be given the opportunity to defend himself, as dictated by the audi alterem partem rule,” Radebe said.

“This failure by the PSC, notwithstanding a request by me to create the opportunity for Simelane to state his case, is actually a flagrant abuse of his fundamental rights.” This gave him sufficient basis to reject the PSC report, Radebe said.

Simelane had also been accused of interfering with the prosecutorial independence of the NPA, as director-general of justice, by drafting a letter on behalf of Mabandla that unconstitutionally instructed Pikoli to stop the arrest of then police commissioner Jackie Selebi. Radebe laid the blame on Mabandla, saying her signature on the letter “authorised and approved its contents”.

He said commissioner Frene Ginwala should have called Mabandla to give oral evidence about the letter. She was not called , and her evidence was by written submission. There was speculation at the time that the government was desperate to avoid Mabandla giving evidence.

Radebe also rejected the PSC’s finding that Simelane had breached the code of conduct for public service when he withheld from the inquiry a legal opinion on the proper relationship between the executive and the NPA. The legal opinion had supported Pikoli’s view of the relationship between the executive and the NPA instead of Simelane’s opinion.

During the inquiry, Simelane first denied having obtained the legal opinion but later admitted to it.

Radebe said Simelane had simply “corrected himself” with this admission, and that did not justify any conclusion that he was lying.

He said Ginwala’s finding that Simelane “had no role to play” as far as the NPA was concerned was wrong. He based his view on the judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal in a case involving President Jacob Zuma, which said that the minister of justice exercised “final responsibility” over the NPA.

Independent Democrats leader Patricia de Lille said Radebe’s briefing was a “a futile spin exercise” .

“No amount of spinning by the justice minister will convince South Africans that advocate Simelane is a fit and proper person for this esteemed position,” she said.

“The fact of the matter is that Simelane lied under oath during the Ginwala commission and was described by the commission as being ‘arrogant and condescending’ towards former NPA head Vusi Pikoli,” De Lille said.

Post comment here (You must login first)   Login | Register
All comments are moderated and will be posted only if they are about the subject and are not abusive, vulgar and/or discriminatory
Article Tools
Print
By: henriw On: Dec 1 2009 6:55AM
Simelane was Zuma's secret weapon. He is now being rewarded for a job well done. Whoever believes in independent, balanced prosecution and justice henceforth must wake up. The recent Zapiro cartoon of Simelane aping Zuma's every word aptly illustrates what to expect.
By: rmyoung On: Dec 1 2009 7:33AM
Actually, Simelane was Mbeki's secret weapon. Remember him? But politics is a strange beast and an even stranger concoction of realities has now made Simelane Zuma's and Mbeki's secret weapon. The weapon is being used to try to prevent both from going to the slammer for 15 years or more.
By: Mapengo2000 On: Dec 1 2009 7:56AM
How is he going to be independent?
By: geanann On: Dec 1 2009 8:35AM
Honest Jeff and Evil Frene. It seems the only problem with Simelane is his memory lapses. See more on the great man and his sponsors: http://letterdash.com/g.annandale/npa-independence-and-political-sensitivity
By: shannig On: Dec 1 2009 8:43AM
We're only too happy to grant Simelane his right to reply to a reputable inquiry, but thus far the weight of evidence leaves little doubt that his appointment is as much of a violation of our Constitution and of the rule of law as was the firing of the honest Vusi Pikoli and the absolution of Shabby Shaik's partner in crime.
By: v3 On: Dec 1 2009 8:50AM
Radebe has now had every opportunity to defend his and Zuma's choice. Whatever the truth about Simelane is, it sends out a clear message about Zuma's and the ANC's commitment to fighting corruption - "Justice must not only be done, it must be SEEN to be done". The issue is no longer whether Simeland is fit and proper for his position, but whether Radebe is fit and proper for HIS.
By: The Ethical Induna On: Dec 1 2009 8:56AM
Simelane is another useful lackey who virtually repeated what the SAPS has become. A bunch to bribe. In this case, no docket needed to be expunged, no, Simelane merely applied what's known as "his mind" in deciding the merits. Eg, Should I lick the sphincter here, or here, or here ? Simpering Simelane will remain in situ BECAUSE of the complaints, that's how broeder.. sorry, brother bonders work. Now it's up to us to trip him up and watch him fall.
By: The Ethical Induna On: Dec 1 2009 8:59AM
Ps, Shabir Shaik, ANCYL, Simelane, ZUma, Selebi ... Arms Deal.. Oilgate .. Manto "pass me another double Sam" Tshabalala, your local SAPS docket theft specialist .. foreign policy refusing to condemn Sudan, Zim. The colour of failure and cowardice is yellow. And the ANC is now fully yellow. Are we too yellow to do something about this? Get up, Stand up.
By: Opstoker On: Dec 1 2009 9:32AM
Radebe, you mealie-mouthed runt: isn't that exactly what you did to Ngcuka et al? And if a man is condemned by the noise of his own mouth, does he require "the right to reply"? To whom?
By: kbb On: Dec 1 2009 10:51AM
I dont know if the Minister knows this but Adv Unterhalter SC received millions from the Competition Commission for legal work during Simelane's tenure as it's head..so why should Unterhalter ever be critical of the hand that fed him his millions...makes you think !!!
Advertisement

  Breaking News

News
World News
Markets
Available RSS Feeds
 
 

Subscribe  |  Advertise  |  Contact Us  |  Register  |  SiteMap  |  NewsLetter

Financial Mail   |  Summit TV   |  Bignews   |  Netassets   |  I-Net Bridge   |  Business Media in Education   |  Pearson Plc   |  Avusa

BDFM Publishers (Pty) Ltd disclaims all liability for any loss, damage, injury or expense however caused, arising from the use of or reliance upon, in any manner, the information provided through
this service and does not warrant the truth, accuracy or completeness of the information provided.
online publishers association member Proudly Part of Avusa Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 BDFM Publishers (Pty) Ltd. All Rights Reserved