CompaniesPREMIUM

Lobby group wins right to hearing on Eskom’s secret data

Eskom may be compelled to reveal whether it is favouring the Gupta family in its coal contracts

Exxaro’s Inyanda Coal Mine in Witbank. Picture: ROBERT TSHABALALA
Exxaro’s Inyanda Coal Mine in Witbank. Picture: ROBERT TSHABALALA

Eskom may be compelled to reveal whether it is favouring the Gupta family in its coal contracts after an initial victory by the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa).

Outa successfully appealed to the National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) to hold a public hearing on Eskom’s application to keep certain of its operating statistics a secret. The hearing will be held on Friday at Nersa’s head office in Pretoria.

Outa suspects Eskom is not disclosing the statistics because it includes the actual amounts of "Gupta coal" for which Eskom pays twice as much as it does to other suppliers.

The Gupta family-controlled Tegeta Resources supplies coal on contract to three of Eskom’s power stations — Arnot, Hendrina and Majuba. Various aspects of these coal transactions have raised concerns.

Eskom refused to renew its contract with Exxaro’s Arnot mine to supply the Arnot power station, saying the coal was too expensive. It then awarded the contract to Tegeta. Tegeta is supplying Arnot from the Optimum mine at a higher price than Optimum receives for the coal it supplies to Hendrina on a long-term contract.

Tegeta bought Glencore’s Optimum Coal Mine out of business rescue in late 2015 with the assistance of an unprecedented R660m advance payment from the state power utility.

Apart from the loss-making Hendrina contract, Optimum was also faced with a R2bn penalty from Eskom for supplying substandard coal. For Tegeta, Eskom has agreed to reduce the penalty to R200m.

In March, Eskom told Nersa it could not meet certain requirements for its application for a tariff hike of 19.9% in 2018-19. These include providing coal volumes burnt per station, per contract type or per supplier; a valuation of its regulatory asset base; research costs; and details of coal handling costs.

Outa argued that this application should be rejected. "Outa objected to these exemptions when stakeholders were asked to offer written comment earlier in 2017," the organisation’s director for energy, Ted Blom, said on Tuesday.

"In addition, Outa informed Nersa that, in our opinion, Nersa is obliged to hold public hearings on this critical matter."

Blom said the organisation had information "relating to the ongoing corruption, fraud and mismanagement at Eskom".

"Today it is an established fact that Eskom is a corrupt cesspool of ongoing crime."

In his submission to Nersa, Blom said the "gross stealing and corruption" at the utility rendered it inefficient and nullified any justification for increases in tariffs. On these grounds, tariffs should be reduced by at least 50%.

With Charlotte Mathews


Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon