The year 2024 was a critical one for the South African retail industry, with several independent retailers entering business rescue proceedings.
This stemmed from a combination of economic hurdles, shifting consumer behaviour, financial mismanagement, the lingering effects of the Covid-19 pandemic and political unrest.
West Pack Lifestyle, AutoZone, Petzone and Cross Trainer illustrate the broader challenges facing the sector.
West Pack Lifestyle, a household name in the discount retail space, entered business rescue in May after accumulating R118m in debt. The company’s aggressive expansion strategy, characterised by high capital costs and overextended inventory ultimately led to financial distress.
However, a six-month restructuring plan culminated in the sale of its businesses and assets to a private buyer. This quick intervention safeguarded more than 1,100 jobs across 70 stores, showcasing the potential for successful turnarounds through decisive action.
Petzone, closely linked to West Pack, also entered business rescue after failing to meet its debt obligations. This case indicated the interconnected nature of conglomerates and the ripple effects of financial distress within them.
AutoZone, one of the country’s largest independent automotive parts retailers, faced a different set of challenges. A leveraged buyout in 2014 saddled the company with unsustainable debt, eroding profitability and forcing it into business rescue in July.
However, JSE-listed industrial group Metair has acquired AutoZone for R290m, ensuring its survival. The acquisition aligns with Metair’s diversification strategy, signalling confidence in AutoZone’s prospects under new leadership.
Cross Trainer, a prominent sportswear retailer with more than 67 stores, struggled under the weight of external pressures, including the pandemic and the 2021 unrest, which worsened existing vulnerabilities.
Tupperware, a globally recognised brand that had provided income opportunities for many South Africans, also faced severe financial challenges. Though the company did not enter business rescue in SA, its global bankruptcy forced the closure of operations here, in Australia and other markets by the end of 2024.
In December, SA distributors were informed of store closures, with job losses affecting employees and distributors. The closures stemmed from Tupperware’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy, followed by the sale of core assets for $69.3m (R1.2bn) in November. Under new leadership, Tupperware is shifting focus to eight core markets, including the US, China and India, and will be adopting a digital-first, asset-light business model.
Despite the restructuring, SA customers can still purchase Tupperware products through independent consultants, e-commerce platforms and retail partners. However, the exit marks the end of an era for Tupperware’s physical presence in SA.
The struggles of these retailers reveal recurring themes of overambition and poor financial management. Over-leveraged acquisitions, aggressive expansion and insufficient working capital left many companies vulnerable to external shocks such as economic downturns and evolving consumer behaviour.
By contrast, publicly listed entities and businesses with better market focus have fared better, using their scale and resources to navigate headwinds.
The year has underscored the importance of strategic decision-making and adaptability in the face of unprecedented challenges. Whether these lessons translate into a more sustainable future for the retail sector remains to be seen.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.