Investors have enjoyed strong returns from markets this year. Were initial fears about the lack of impetus for structural reform in SA and the risks posed by US President Donald Trump’s trade policies exaggerated? Or has the market become too complacent?
Financial markets have shrugged off a non-cohesive government of national unity (GNU) and the threat of Trump’s unconventional policies. The SA 10-year bond yield (the price the government pays on the debt it issues) has rallied this year despite a deteriorating local economic growth outlook and three attempts at a February budget. Meanwhile, a global economic hard landing is no longer widely expected, even though Trump has unilaterally implemented substantial manufacturing tariffs on large parts of the global economy.
The main takeaway seems to be that it could have been worse. At least SA passed a budget and Trump (with some notable exceptions) has toned down the scale of the tariffs. But it is one thing to be relieved that the worst outcome may be avoided, quite another to believe we are heading in the right direction.
In the short term the SA economy remains vulnerable to higher global tariffs, and the impasse between the two largest parties in the GNU is not a solid foundation for an economic reset.
More fundamentally, market belief in the prospect of genuine economic reform in SA might require the ANC to no longer be the dominant party in the GNU, while opposition control of at least one part of the US government might be necessary for a break on Trump’s seemingly unfettered power. Neither of these might happen any time soon, although Democratic control of the House of Representatives is at least possible in next year’s midterms.
The market is reassured that it does not need to price in the highly adverse tail risks of either a collapse of the GNU or the global financial trading system. The assumption is that the DA and ANC will remain in the GNU no matter how many “red lines” are crossed, and likewise Trump will dial back his unconventional policies if they inflict too much self-harm.
The market is reassured that it does not need to price in the highly adverse tail risks of either a collapse of the GNU or the global financial trading system.
Meanwhile, Trump is testing how far he can exert control over other US institutions, including the Federal Reserve, without eroding confidence in the independence of US institutions. This is a dangerous game with potentially wide-ranging outcomes.
Of course, this does not mean investors will not be able to make money in this environment or that certain companies or strategies will not do well. This year, SA-listed gold miners have been major beneficiaries of the weakening dollar (and appreciating gold price), while despite the tariff shenanigans the “Magnificent Seven” large tech companies have reasserted their dominance and even beaten lofty earnings expectations.
At some point the depressed valuations of certain SA-listed equities tied to the domestic economy will become so compelling that they could perform well despite the challenging economic environment. And superbly well if the cycle turns.
The IMF recently upgraded its economic growth forecasts for the US and China (though not SA) given that the trade war is proving less damaging than initially feared. Even though higher inflation is a concern, the Fed is widely expected to ease interest rates as US employment growth slows.
What to make of all this? With investing one should always be prepared for the unexpected. While it is important never to understate the possibility of adverse outcomes, experience shows that markets more often surprise to the upside than collapse under the weight of fear. Recent resilience is welcome but does not remove the risks that remain, from US policy uncertainty to SA’s structural challenges.
The more effective course is not prediction but discipline: building portfolios around quality, diversification and sound risk management. That balance, resilient enough to withstand shocks yet positioned to capture upside when it comes, is ultimately what defines long-term investment success.
• Crosoer is chief investment officer at PPS Investments.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.