ColumnistsPREMIUM

NEELS BLOM: The dark tower of despair that is Eskom

Eskom chair Jabu Mabuza wants a government bailout and he wants South Africans to allow Eskom to do business as it pleases

Neels Blom

Neels Blom

Writer at large

Pylons outside the Koeberg Nuclear Power Station near Melkbosstrand on the Cape West Coast. Picture: MARK WESSELS
Pylons outside the Koeberg Nuclear Power Station near Melkbosstrand on the Cape West Coast. Picture: MARK WESSELS

Click to edit the intro

A bitter truth is sinking in: Eskom wants more money and we the people are going to give it to the failing state-owned power utility.

First it will be a R100bn or so to fund the interest on debt it cannot repay, and then hundreds of billions more if SA is going to continue as anything remotely resembling a modern state.

It is not as though we have the cash lying around, but it will be found and most likely through loan sharks that will see the nation indebted beyond any hope of economic development. Still, prudent little citizen investors should be doing their sums before submitting to the inevitable co-option, if only to maintain an illusion of honour.                                                                                   

But before we get to that there is a little matter of semantics. When Eskom chair Jabu Mabuza (ably patronised by public enterprise minister Pravin Gordhan) explained to the nation its “choice of pain” at a media briefing last week about rolling power failures, he said that Eskom’s failure to meet SA’s electricity needs “are problems that we have all caused”.

By that he means South Africans are all to blame for the catastrophic venality and incompetence that passes for management at the country’s state-owned enterprises (SOEs), including and especially Eskom.

Eskom and its succession of shareholder representatives (the ministers in the ANC government) are to blame for the blackouts, no-one else.

Mabuza is wrong of course, but — to be generous — he may have intended to inspire citizen co-operation by urging them to take responsibility for “putting us back in a sustainable way”. This would be reasonable if only because the nation has no choice but to co-operate if it wants electricity. But taking responsibility by agreeing to help fix a problem is not the same as accepting blame for causing the problem.

Mabuza wants the money, and he wants the nation to give it freely and tacitly agree to Eskom continuing to do business the way it has always done business, that is, as an arrogant and dismissive bully.

Eskom and its succession of shareholder representatives (the ministers in the ANC government) are to blame for the blackouts, no-one else. The citizens on to whom Mabuza wants to shift the blame are Eskom’s long-suffering paying customers. Mabuza, as perpetrator representative, is blaming his victims.

Which brings us to what we must do. The first thing is to take a hard look at Eskom’s assets. Its power stations, including the massively expensive and uncompleted Kusile and Medupi, are steadily being written off, as is the way with all capital goods. That means that unless Eskom continues to build new generating capacity, it will soon have no capacity to speak of. And unless the state nationalises the coal mines, the power stations will have no fuel with which to heat its kettles.

This means its national grid will be worthless, just like everything else tangible in that ivory tower of despair that is Eskom. As Mabuza says, asset sales are not an option, because the “only assets we can sell, no one will buy”.

But it does have one asset and perhaps it is for sale. Eskom owns the right created by state monopoly capital to generate and distribute electricity. This is the only reason Eskom continues to exist. None of the causes for Eskom’s failure enumerated by Gordhan and Mabuza are attributable to the sometimes-onerous developmental imperatives imposed on SOEs, while all of it refers to venality and incompetence. These are grounds for termination at any organisation anywhere, parastatal or private.

Eskom’s terrible legacy is that it is too big and too risky to sell intact, or even as separate generating and distribution entities. Yet, this is what we must do. The most likely success would be to break up distribution into short-distance, low-friction regional and district network operators who are free to buy electricity from anyone with a solar panel. Sugar mills and maize producers also come to mind.

We’ll fund it, and pay off Eskom’s debt, by auctioning off the rights to generate and distribute locally. With our lot in charge, regulation is a cinch.

It does mean though that Eskom and the politicians who control it must accept blame for screwing up the nation’s power supply. And when they have taken that first step, citizens will shoulder their share of the responsibility for fixing it.

• Blom is a flyfisher who likes to write.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon