ColumnistsPREMIUM

BRIAN KANTOR: Ideologues and rent-seekers are behind SA’s nursing crisis

The government has turned a blind eye to the looming shortage, despite warnings

Brian Kantor

Brian Kantor

Columnist

A nurse preparing to vaccinate. Picture: SEBABATSO MOSAMO/SUNDAY TIMES
A nurse preparing to vaccinate. Picture: SEBABATSO MOSAMO/SUNDAY TIMES

Netcare CEO Richard Friedland’s warning of a looming nursing crisis in SA is a depressing reflection of the state of the country. A cohort of ageing cohort of nurses, many of whom will soon be retiring, is not being replaced, due to government inaction.

It was warned well in advance but chose to ignore the warning, Friedland says. Netcare had been accredited to train more than 3,000 nurses a year but was allowed to train “barely a 10th of that”.  

Clearly there is demand for more nurses and a large potential supply given the employment benefits and career prospects of the profession. Why would the government stand in the way of Netcare and others helping to close the gap between supply and demand?   

One explanation is the argument against private medicine in principle. The case for equal treatment for all, paid for by the taxpayer, is one the ideologues who dominate in the department of health cling to fervently. Nursing and other services provided privately threaten this vision.  

Yet even the ideologues appear to concede the case for better-off individuals being able to pay extra for top-up medical benefits. Perhaps they understand that wealthy people are likely to take themselves and their contribution to the revenues of government away from SA for want of world-class and affordable medical services. This is a service we can now receive from private hospitals and independent physicians — if we are willing to pay.  

For an economy so obviously lacking in human capital — not only the capital embodied in the cohort of nurses who are such attractive potential emigrants — the consequences of an uncompetitive medical offering for highly mobile skilled South Africans are truly disastrous for income growth and taxes collected in SA. It is these taxes upon which any National Health Insurance (NHI) system must ultimately depend. Equal and hopelessly inferior is not an attractive prospect, even for those who ignore the realities of our government-provided medical services.  

But why is the government, with its own large suite of public hospitals and enormous budgets, failing to train more nurses, and doctors for that matter? The answer is in the existing budget constraints. Budgets provide well for those already in government service and offer employment benefits that keep up with and often exceed rising living costs, but they leave little to employ new entrants to government service, of whom there are potentially legions.

The private sector does not compete at all well with the public sector in the competition for workers of all skills, taking into account the private medical and pension benefits public sector employees now draw upon. But more important in the resistance to private medicine may be the force already prominent in explaining the actions and allocations of budget commonly taken by state-operated agencies in SA — public hospitals and their procurement practices definitely not excepted.

The taxpayer is being held to ransom by the opportunists who intermediate between the state as payer and providers of health services and equipment. They have been extracting wealth from taxpayers on a mind-numbing scale, as the Zondo state capture commission, media and US government have revealed. 

It is envisaged that the NHI system will be the single payer for all health services provided by the state. The intended budget will be enormous, and the opportunities to navigate the gaps between the government as payer and the service and goods providers will be many and lucrative. That you cannot do (big) business with the SA government without a bribe or kickback is now unfortunately a reality.

The evidence vitiates the case for a universal healthcare system in SA. But the private interests promoting such an arrangement are immensely powerful, and providers of private medicine in SA will have to resist strongly to survive. They must make their case to the voting public, as Netcare has done. 

• Kantor is head of the research institute at Investec Wealth & Investment. He writes in his personal capacity.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon