Domestic first-class cricket in SA may be vital to producing a competitive Proteas Test team but it is also responsible for one of the largest expense items on the Cricket SA annual balance sheet.
The decision this year to reduce the four-day competition to a single round of matches between the eight teams in division one has enraged the country’s provincial coaches and senior players, with good reason. As Lions and former Proteas coach Russell Domingo told the Sunday Times last week: “You don’t get better at anything by doing less of it.”
In an ideal, cricket purist’s world, the eight teams would play each other home and away each season in 14 games, but there is neither the money nor the time to do that. Ten games would be a good number with the three “extra” matches being derbies to save money and give more people the chance to attend. As painful as it is to say, Cricket SA’s decision is merely keeping in step with the global trend.
Australia’s Sheffield Shield is contested by the six state teams on a home-and-away basis, playing 10 matches each before the final between the top two. In New Zealand the same format was cut by two matches six years ago, leaving the six teams playing eight league matches without a final.
The Quaid-e-Azam Trophy in Pakistan is contested by eight teams playing a single round of matches and alternating the home and away venues each year, exactly as SA will now do. In the West Indies, where first-class cricket is more expensive and logistically challenging than anywhere else, the format has changed often to save on costs. Currently, the six teams play a single round of matches without a final.
Sri Lanka is slightly different to the other Test-playing nations because club cricket, strongly affiliated to traditional “feeder” schools, remains strong and just as likely to produce national cricketers as the five formal first-class teams which play eight matches.
More squeezed
Even in England, with 18 first-class counties, the 10 division one teams play 14 matches, fewer than before, and there is still talk about reducing that number further now that the entire month of August has been reserved for The Hundred competition and there remains a full, exhausting Vitality Blast T20 schedule, as well as the 50-over competition.
Every country in the world has faced the “cost versus reward” conundrum and it has become ever more squeezed since one-day and then T20 cricket became formats in which costs were lower and income greater than in the first-class game. But without the first-class game there are none of the joys of Test cricket.
The nirvana for administrations worldwide is to make multi-day cricket profitable, or at least self-sustainable. The reality is that spectator numbers are negligible everywhere except England so the alternative is sponsorship, particularly title sponsorship. But that is also on the decrease in most countries and has disappeared altogether from SA cricket except with the Betway SA20.
So, the compromise has been to cut costs (games) and sharpen the drive towards “harder” matches, to intensify the level of competition, the “strength versus strength” argument. It was the main reason for the formation of the franchise system in SA, but no-one was prepared to cut funding to the loss-making unions so we ended up with 21 teams rather than six and lost even more money.
Now the drive is towards more cricket for the SA A team, a higher level of cricket involving the “next best” players with the aim of bridging the gap between provincial cricket and the full international game.
But one major problem, among many, with having a skeletal number of games and alternating home and away venues annually, is identifying the next best. It is entirely possible that rain in Durban one year, an injury in Gqeberha the next and a greentop at Newlands could conspire to prevent a talented batter playing more than a few games at coastal venues in his most formative years. He might have a pile of highveld runs but can he cope at the coast?
India has focused on “big” domestic matches with high intensity for many decades. The Ranji Trophy is the premier first-class competition in which the states play seven group matches. But they are followed by quarterfinals, semifinals and a final, each with increasing prestige. And it gets better.
The Duleep Trophy is a regional tournament involving four zonal teams, North, South, East and West (though they have become A, B, C and D this year.) If a young player makes the cut there he knows he’s on the radar.
And finally, the Irani Trophy is played for between the Ranji Trophy winners and the Rest of India in the most prestigious first-class match of the year. More quality, less quantity. Easier said than done, but the right goal.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.