There is a strong argument to suggest that the World Test Championship is the most structurally flawed competition between nations in any sport, ever. Two of the teams in it will never play against each other and all of the teams only play six of the other eight. Randomly.
Except for the “big three”. India, England and Australia will always play against each other, a lot. The rest are drawn out of a hat, but under supervision. The “small seven” nations are free to make requests. So are the big three. England and Australia would prefer not to play Bangladesh at home, thank you. They’ve got tickets to sell. So that doesn’t happen.
Some of those series consist of five Test matches, some are three but most have only two fixtures. To “flatten” this oddity the teams are judged on their winning percentage but that counts heavily against the teams which play longer series because it’s much harder to win four out of five than two out of two.
And yet, and yet... For all its comical imperfections and ludicrous logistics, it is better than nothing. In the case of SA and New Zealand, it is almost certainly the only thing that will keep the format alive for another few years. Though the ramifications of Cricket SA sending a “C” team to New Zealand are still being felt, and will be for years to come.
That it exists at all is a monumental feat of political and sporting compromise. Dozens of formats were proposed over the course of many years, all of them knocked back by objections from various member nations. Two divisions would make a lot of sense but was vetoed by everyone who thought they might be in the second tier. India vs Pakistan at a neutral venue? Nope.
The only thing which holds it all together is the prize. Five days at Lord’s in June 2025 and the prestige of the title are incentive enough, but it is also the commercial benefits of being Test Champions. Prize money for the players is welcome but, more importantly, the likelihood of more fixtures in future Test cycles, both home and away.
Only England and are not motivated by the WTC — they don’t need to be. The game is still in rude health in the country and the national obsession with the Ashes meant that a new competition would struggle to catch the collective imagination. For everybody else, including Australia and India, the competition and the title are relevant and important.
In fact, India were so desperate to beat Bangladesh in their second Test in Kanpur, which finishes on Tuesday, they produced one of the most extraordinary performances in the entire history of the game on Monday to give themselves a chance.
Having finally dismissed their visitors for 233 after two entire days were lost to rain, the home side smashed their way to a staggering 285/9 in just 34.4 overs before declaring and grabbing two second innings wickets shortly before the close of play on day four. At 26/2, Bangladesh still trail by 26 runs and face a tumultuous battle to avoid defeat.
India and Australia currently occupy the top two places on the WTC log and would, ordinarily, be heading for a repeat of the last final which Australia won. But they play each other in five Tests for the Border-Gavaskar Trophy in November and heavy defeat for either nation could well eliminate them from contention for a place in the final.
“It is there and we pay attention to it because it’s something that we can realistically still be a big part of. According to my calculations I reckon five out of six wins should get us there, obviously depending on a few other results going our way,” said coach Shukri Conrad in announcing the squad to play Bangladesh later in October.
So, one win in either Dhaka or Chattogram and 2-0 victories against Sri Lanka and Pakistan in the SA summer could see the Proteas lining up for the most important Test match in their history in the English summer.
If they do get there, of course, it would be six months after their last Test match and in the middle of their winter when most of the squad would not have played red ball cricket for months. Which is just another one of the ugly realities of a competition which would have been stillborn in any other sport. It may be a runt but it is cricket’s runt and we need to nurture it because it’s all there is.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.