EditorialsPREMIUM

EDITORIAL: Coup risk joins public ledger

Timing and context of disclosure raise deeper questions

Minister in the presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni. Picture: GCIS
Minister in the presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni. Picture: GCIS

Minister Khumbudzo Ntshavheni’s alarming comments on a potential coup attempt in SA should not be taken lightly, as the political dynamics in the country are fluid and unpredictable. 

In a briefing to parliament dubbed “historic” by the minister, she outlined the national security strategy and national intelligence estimates for the period 2019-24. For the first time, the state, through Ntshavheni, who works in President Cyril Ramaphosa’s office, acknowledged that threats to constitutional order are not abstract or imported. They are domestic, proximate and politically entangled. 

Her remarks, while tempered to reassure, nonetheless confirmed that coup plotting is being monitored and mitigated.  The briefing and the security report — redacted though it was- marked a sea change in state security transparency, a domain long cloaked in secrecy and too often mired in controversy over the past three decades. 

The report shows the public how the state conceptualises risk. Not confined to bunkers, but embedded in the political bloodstream. The report defines a coup as a key threat and as an attempt by the armed forces to violently overthrow the constitutional order in SA. This public nod to coup plotting is more than semantics. It recasts the intelligence community posture from fortress-like secrecy to conditional daylight. 

The timing and context of this disclosure raise deeper questions. The security cluster has come under intense scrutiny, mainly due to the explosive allegations by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who accused minister of police Senzo Mchunu and deputy police commissioner for crime detection Shadrack Sibiya of colluding with organised crime cartels to block police investigations. Mkhwanazi’s militarised presentation — flanked by armed officers — was as symbolic as it was unsettling. 

Mchunu and Sibiya have been put on special leave by their respective bosses and Ramaphosa has also instituted a judicial commission of inquiry, to be chaired by soon-to-be retired Constitutional Court justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga.

Is it an attempt at distraction from Mkhwanazi’s damning allegations? Or is it linked to the resurgence of former president Jacob Zuma through his MK party?

Still, Ntshavheni was adamant that the coup threat had not played out over the last “week or month”, the period in which Mkhwanazi held his briefing. 

The juxtaposition of Ntshavheni’s coup warning with Mkhwanazi’s allegations invites two primary lines of speculation. Is it an attempt at distraction from Mkhwanazi’s damning allegations? Or is it linked to the resurgence of former president Jacob Zuma through his MK party?

It is no secret that Zuma was a securocrat who bent the institutions in the criminal justice system to his will, nor that a large number of his loyalists remain inside the system. His former secretary-general, Floyd Shivambu, is openly building a new political party and proposing a coup in its founding documents. The temptation to draw causal lines must be resisted, but the institutional imperative to interrogate overlapping risks must not. 

Markets have barely flinched. The rand held firm and yields stayed on script, suggesting traders view the coup as political theatre rather than a looming crisis. But the real valuation hinges on follow through. Beefing up the inspector- general of intelligence, depoliticising crime intelligence and giving the national intelligence co-ordinating committee genuine teeth.

The 2018 Mufamadi panel already branded the old State Security Agency “misaligned” and “politicised”. A public strategy release is a start. But without enforcement, it’s an empty disclosure, not an institutional reform.

The main question is whether Ramaphosa’s security architecture, tested and found wanting during the July 2021 riots, can fend off an even deeper, more sinister threat. Because in business, you don’t just list risks, you hedge them. SA has named its coup risk. Now comes the hard part: proving it can be managed and confronting the rot in the ranks of our institutions. 

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon