OpinionPREMIUM

LETTER: Advice about Eskom pension fund is misguided

The ambition to make development investments leading to societal change is best left to professionals that have a reputation

Eskom’s Megawatt Park headquarters in Joburg. Picture: WALDO SWIEGERS/BLOOMBERG
Eskom’s Megawatt Park headquarters in Joburg. Picture: WALDO SWIEGERS/BLOOMBERG

As a pensioner member of the Eskom Pension and Provident Fund (EPPF), I am greatly disturbed at the recommendations made by employed personnel (“Institutional investors have financial might to change mindsets and investment patterns”, September 14).

The investment performance as shown on the EPPF website continues to underperform its benchmark (and hence investment objective) over all periods, a significant portion of which Ndabe Mkhize appears to have overseen. These investments were mainly in vanilla asset classes that have a long history, reasonable transaction costs and, more importantly, a level of transparency.

This ambition to make development investments lead to societal changes is best left to professionals that have a reputation, track record and function to manage change. Let the EPPF remain a retirement saving vehicle for current and past Eskom employees.

Henny le Roux

Brits

JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an e-mail with your comments. Letters of more than 300 words may be edited for length. Send your letter by e-mail to letters@businesslive.co.za. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime phone number.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon