LETTER: Artisanal mining confusion

Christopher Rutledge’s article raises questions about responsibilities, regulation and legality

Volunteers arrive to aid zama-zamas underground at Stilfontein mine in Orkney, the North WesT. Picture: ANTONIO MUCHAVE
Volunteers arrive to aid zama-zamas underground at Stilfontein mine in Orkney, the North WesT. Picture: ANTONIO MUCHAVE

Christopher Rutledge’s article refers (“Mantashe’s high-stakes chess game is risking life and limb”, November 20).

Is he saying “artisanal” miners should be allowed to mine at will, without any of the health, safety or environmental responsibilities imposed on formal mining companies?

And when these informal miners die, who is responsible? Who cleans up the environment once they move on? At what point does artisanal mining end and formal mining commence? Why impose draconian standards on formal mining if a free-for-all is allowed in the informal sector?

Mining is not a harmless activity. The term artisanal is an attempt to normalise a crude, dangerous and criminal activity. How about artisanal metal collectors, stripping infrastructure? Artisanal waste collectors leaving environmental destruction in their wake.

Do we have laws or don’t we? Do we impose standards or not? Either way, just apply and enforce the law.

Michael Blain

Via BusinessLIVE

JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon