The furore surrounding Shell’s seismic survey plans for the Wild Coast has highlighted the powerful role that civil resistance can play in the decarbonisation drive.
But there are other weighty tools that can influence the direction of the world’s climate change response, foremost being long-term capital allocation.
We have highlighted that capital, or the impactful application of capital, remains one of the most vital components in the world’s climate change response machinery, and subsequently asset managers globally can and must now play a decisive role in redirecting institutional and retail investors’ capital towards sustainable investments.
As asset managers, we have an undeniable responsibility to understand how climate action affects the companies we invest in.
Old Mutual Investment Group (OMIG), which stewards around R415bn in client capital, is among the many savings and investment industry stakeholders that are aligned with the global climate goal of reducing carbon emissions to limit the global average annual temperature increase to less than 1.5°C between now and 2100.
The investment firm has joined the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative, a group of about 220 global asset managers with an estimated $57-trillion (R860-trillion) of assets under management that have pledged to align their businesses with global efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C by 2050 or sooner.
In line with its commitment to the initiative, OMIG will be working on decarbonisation investment targets and will disclose these publicly in the next 12 months.
Talk of a second seismic survey planned by Australian geoscience data supplier Searcher Seismic has followed Dutch petroleum company Shell’s most recent efforts.
This raises the question of the role of developed markets in helping to steer emerging markets such as SA in the right direction to support a just transition, in addition to the role of developing markets to plan the pursuit of a less carbon-intensive growth path.
Among the notable developments in the climate change fight are the recent large value transactions by the Green Climate Fund (GCF), which was created to support developing countries in responding to climate change.
The GCF’s decisions reinforce the shared, but differentiated, responsibility between developed and emerging economies, namely that countries that were historical polluters should act early and support access to technology and financing, whereas emerging market economies should plan the growth of their economies to be low carbon and socially inclusive.
At last year’s COP26 event, an announcement was made that SA had secured funding commitments totalling $8.5bn from developed market countries to invest towards a just transition to net-zero carbon emissions.
The funding is an opportunity to reset not only from a governance perspective but also to imagine a new reindustrialisation pathway for the South African economy.
Allocators of capital must create an environment that enables climate goals to be achieved. It is in our interest to steward investee firms towards positive climate outcomes and provide the market with the debt and equity products to achieve this.
Global listed markets have already seen a big shift away from primary producers of fossil fuels, which today account for only 2.5% of the MSCI World index.
But decarbonisation is not as simple as steering portfolio investments towards listed companies with high environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings. Investors should start thinking about decarbonising their investment portfolios, but we must also consider the real-world infrastructure investments in, for example, renewable energy, needed to achieve net-zero targets over the next 3-4 decades.
The country’s main carbon culprits are easily identifiable, offering clear wins for purposeful policymakers
Support for portfolios that achieve ESG outcomes, including decarbonisation, is on the rise thanks to growing evidence that sustainable investing enhances rather than impedes investment returns.
Stewardship will emerge as our biggest impact in delivering sustainable development outcomes; our north star is to achieve impact-aligned sustainable development goals.
In this context, all stakeholder engagements taking place are cognisant of factors such as climate risk, ethical leadership, social inequality, sound pay and social justice and transformation.
SA will have to clear some tough socioeconomic hurdles to achieve a just transition away from fossil fuels. These will be overcome by a combination of reallocating capital from areas with high fossil fuels exposure towards renewables and ongoing engagements with listed companies on their transition plans.
The country’s main carbon culprits are easily identifiable, offering clear wins for purposeful policymakers.
More than 50% of the JSE’s carbon intensity links to electricity use, which in turn causes electricity grid emissions from Eskom’s ageing coal-fired power infrastructure, while much of Sasol’s carbon footprint stems from its steam reformation hydrogen extraction process.
An accelerated shift to renewables seems a sensible starting point. SA is in the top 5% of the world in terms of the quality of our solar and wind resources, and modelling has been done to show that our base load peak demand can be met with renewable energy.
SA's private sector developers and funders, in partnership with the government, already have a solid track record of bringing solar and wind power projects on stream quickly.
All that is needed for the country to meet its 2050 net-zero emissions target is to scale our renewables response.
• Lewenson is head of responsible investing at Old Mutual Investment Group
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.