OpinionPREMIUM

BERNARD DROTSCHIE: Moody’s downgrade is bad news for US creditworthiness

The US must demonstrate a commitment to stabilising debt levels, either through spending cuts or revenue increases

Picture: REUTERS
Picture: REUTERS

Moody’s recent downgrade of the US’s sovereign credit rating from Aaa to Aa1 underscores mounting concerns over fiscal sustainability.

Historically, such a downgrade signals deteriorating debt dynamics, raising questions about a nation’s ability to service its obligations without excessive reliance on external financing. While the US retains its status as the world’s reserve currency, the downgrade amplifies anxieties surrounding long-term investor confidence and the trajectory of global capital flows.

In theory, a lower credit rating should precipitate higher yields on government bonds, as investors demand greater compensation for risk. However, credit rating agencies often lag behind market realities.

The US debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to surge to 134% by 2035, up from 98% in 2024, reflecting unsustainable fiscal expansion. Despite this, US Treasuries remain a linchpin of global finance and a mass sell-off remains improbable — at least in the near term.

South Africa’s downgrade to junk status in 2020 had profound consequences, including higher borrowing costs, capital flight and diminished investor confidence. While the US downgrade is less severe, the parallels are striking — unchecked debt accumulation and fiscal mismanagement inevitably erode market trust.

South Africa’s debt-to-GDP ratio has climbed to approximately 76%, a dramatic escalation from 25% in 2008. The country’s most pressing challenge remains stagnant economic growth, with GDP expansion projected at 1% to 1.5% in 2025. Without meaningful structural reforms, debt sustainability will become increasingly tenuous.

The South African government has acknowledged the urgency of fiscal discipline, particularly in light of past mismanagement and corruption scandals. Initiatives such as Operation Vulindlela aim to accelerate structural reforms, focusing on infrastructure development, energy stability and private sector investment. However, execution remains a formidable challenge and investor confidence hinges on demonstrable progress rather than policy rhetoric.

One of the broader implications of the downgrade is the potential reallocation of global capital. China’s ownership of US Treasuries has declined significantly over the past 15 years, reflecting a long-term trend of diversification. Investors may increasingly pivot toward European and emerging markets, particularly economies with stronger fiscal discipline such as Germany, Canada, and Australia.

Japan presents an instructive case study — despite a debt-to-GDP ratio of 234.9%, its bond yields remain suppressed due to domestic funding sources and high savings rates. The US, by contrast, is heavily reliant on external financing, rendering it more susceptible to shifts in investor sentiment.

Emerging markets — particularly those priced off US bonds — could see higher sovereign spreads, exacerbating their cost of borrowing

South Africa’s reliance on private sector investment has grown as government funding constraints limit infrastructure spending. The push to privatise key projects in energy, water, and transportation is a necessary step toward economic recovery. However, regulatory clarity and investor incentives remain critical to ensuring sustained participation.

Higher US bond yields could have far-reaching consequences across global markets. Corporate borrowing costs are often linked to sovereign debt rates, meaning US companies may face higher financing costs. Additionally, emerging markets — particularly those priced off US bonds — could see higher sovereign spreads, exacerbating their cost of borrowing.

For South Africa, this means that if US bond yields were to rise significantly and sustainably above 4.5%, local borrowing costs could increase further, placing additional strain on fiscal budgets. This underscores the interconnected nature of global debt markets and the imperative of maintaining investor confidence.

Countries seeking to restore their credit ratings must prioritise fiscal discipline, economic growth and investor transparency. Western Europe’s stronger credit ratings stem from lower deficits and more conservative fiscal policies. The US must demonstrate a commitment to stabilising debt levels, either through spending cuts or revenue increases.

For South Africa, the path to recovery necessitates reducing government expenditure, enhancing tax collection efficiency and fostering private sector-led growth. The government’s commitment to avoiding VAT increases while allowing for bracket creep reflects an effort to balance fiscal responsibility. However, long-term success will depend on reducing bureaucratic inefficiencies and unlocking economic potential through deregulation.

Ultimately, the downgrade serves as a cautionary signal rather than an immediate crisis. Investors should closely monitor fiscal policy developments, as sustained deficits could precipitate further erosion of creditworthiness.

Drotschie is chief investment officer at Melville Douglas, the boutique investment management company for Standard Bank Group

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon