UK police probe Mandelson’s alleged leaks to Epstein

By Alistair Smout and Paul Sandle

London — Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government has handed material to the police to investigate whether Peter Mandelson, Britain’s former US ambassador, leaked market-sensitive information to Jeffrey Epstein during the financial crash.

Starmer told his ministers on Tuesday that Mandelson’s alleged leaks to the late sex offender were “disgraceful”. A few hours later, Mandelson said he would retire from parliament’s upper house, the House of Lords.

Mandelson, a major player in the Labour governments of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown more than two decades ago, is facing the possibility of criminal charges after emails released by the US as part of the Epstein investigation suggested he had leaked confidential government documents to the financier.

The emails suggest that in 2009 Mandelson sent Epstein a memo written for then-prime minister Brown about possible UK asset sales and tax changes, and in 2010 gave Epstein advance notice of a €500bn bailout by the EU.

Mandelson, 72, was fired from his ambassadorial role in September, seven months after being appointed, after documents emerged showing that he had remained close to Epstein for much longer than he had previously acknowledged.

In one message, he appeared to tell Epstein that his earlier conviction, for procuring a child for prostitution, was wrong and he should fight for early release.

On Tuesday, Starmer told his cabinet that his government would co-operate with the police in any inquiries they carried out, adding he was not reassured that the totality of the information had yet emerged, according to his spokesperson.

His comments marked his strongest condemnation yet of the man he appointed ambassador to Washington last year, despite his known association with Epstein who committed suicide in prison in 2019.

“The prime minister said he was appalled by the information that had emerged over the weekend in the Epstein files,” his spokesperson said. The police have said they are reviewing reports about alleged misconduct in public office.

Late on Sunday, Mandelson resigned from the Labour Party to prevent “further embarrassment” after a new release of millions of documents exposed details of his closeness to Epstein, including suggestions of payments to Mandelson and his husband.

The scandal has sparked concerns about Starmer’s decision to appoint Mandelson as ambassador instead of a career diplomat, a decision advocated by his chief of staff Morgan McSweeney.

Labour legislator Clive Efford, speaking in parliament on Monday, said the “key question here is who advised the prime minister?”

Mandelson has not responded to requests about the allegations. A spokesperson, however, has said Mandelson had no recollection of financial payments, totalling $75,000 from Epstein, as suggested by other emails and media reports.

In an interview with the Times conducted late last month and published on Tuesday, Mandelson said Epstein had been a “master manipulator”. He added: “I’ve had a lot of bad luck, no doubt some of it of my own making.”

Starmer, seeking to get on the front foot after some of his legislators said Downing Street’s initial response over the weekend was not strong enough, has ordered an investigation into Mandelson’s links with Epstein during Brown’s government.

Brown, however, pre-empted him, saying that he had asked officials to look into the matter back in September but that he had been told they had unearthed no departmental records.

The former prime minister said on Monday that after the “shocking new information” came to light in the latest tranche of Epstein papers, he had asked for “a wider and more intensive inquiry to take place”.

Starmer has also called for former Prince Andrew to testify before a US congressional committee after new revelations about his links to Epstein.

Asked about the situation at a meeting in Dubai on Tuesday, Prince Edward, Mountbatten-Windsor’s younger brother, said: “It’s really important always to remember the victims”, echoing previous statements from King Charles and Queen Camilla.