By David Shepardson
Washington — US transportation secretary Sean Duffy said on Saturday he does not think the government needs to bail out low-cost airlines that have sought $2.5bn in government relief because of high jet fuel prices, after the collapse of Spirit Airlines.
“At this point, I don’t think it’s necessary. They do have access to cash. If they want to come to the US government, we would be a lender of last resort. If they can find dollars in the private markets ― I think that’s better for them,” Duffy said at a press conference at Newark airport.
He said the prospect of a Spirit bailout was seen by some other airlines as an opportunity to get money “not necessarily based on need, but based on opportunity”.
Last Monday, a group of US budget airlines, including Frontier and Avelo, said it had proposed exchanging warrants that could be converted into equity stakes for $2.5bn in US government assistance.
The Association of Value Airlines confirmed it asked President Donald Trump’s administration to create a $2.5bn liquidity pool, used exclusively to offset incremental fuel costs, “as a necessary and targeted measure to stabilise operations and keep airfares affordable during this period of volatility".
They have also asked Congress to suspend the 7.5% federal excise tax on airline tickets and the $5.30 per segment tax. Waiving the fees would offset about one-third of the incremental cost of higher jet fuel.
Iran war
The pitch highlights one of the unintended consequences of the US-Israeli war with Iran: a surge in jet fuel prices that has roughly doubled costs, squeezing margins and pushing weaker airlines closer to the brink.
The CEOs of several low-cost carriers met with Duffy and Federal Aviation Administration chief Bryan Bedford in Washington last week to discuss the proposal.
The group arrived at the $2.5bn figure by estimating how much more it expects to spend on jet fuel this year compared with earlier forecasts.
Airlines for America, which represents major US passenger airlines, opposed a bailout for budget carriers, saying “government intervention on behalf of those airlines would punish other airlines that have engaged in self-help in order to deal with increased costs and reward airlines that haven’t made those tough decisions. That’s not a level playing field.”
The group added that in the long term, sustaining businesses unable to earn their cost of capital harmed competition and consumers by making it more difficult for other airlines to compete and attract private-sector capital.
The Association of Value Airlines rejected the criticism from Airlines for America, saying government policy had favoured major carriers and “the current surge in jet fuel prices is not the result of poor decision-making or a lack of discipline by value airlines. It is an uncontrollable, extraordinary external shock that disproportionately impacts business models built on offering consistently affordable fares to price-sensitive travellers.”
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.